Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19670 (AP)

Sri G. Satyanarayana Raju v. Union of India

AS/33/2009 · 2026-01-26

V Srinivas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010160332009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 33/2009 Between: 1. SRI G. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O SUBBA RAJU R/O HIG-36, VUDA LAYOUT, MADHAVADHARA, VISHAKAPATNAM-8. 2. SRI P. VENKATESWARA RAJU, S/O BUTCHI RAJU R/O SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SRI I. SUPRAPU RAJU, DIED. 4. SRI D. CHANDRASEKHARA RAJU, DIED. 5. SRI R.B. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, S/O APPALARAJU R/O OLD GAJUWAKA VISHAKAPATNAM. 6. SRI D. PADMANABHA RAJU,, S/O NARAYANA RAJU R/O S. KOTA, VIZIANAGARAM DIST. 7. I. SATYAVATHI, W/O LATE I SURAPU RAJU R/O D.NO. 9-7-40/7, SHIVAJIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 8. I. SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O LATE I SURAPU RAJU R/O D.NO. 9-7-40/7, SHIVAJIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 9. I. SHIVA SANKARA NARAYANA RAJU, S/O LATE I SURAPU RAJU R/O D.NO. 9-7-40/7, SHIVAJIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 10. D. SUNDARI SEETHADEVI, W/O LATE CHANDRASEKHARA RAJU, R/O MIG-416, POTHINAMALLAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. D.V.S.K. RAJU, S/O LATE CHANDRASEKHARA RAJU R/O MIG-416, POTHINAMALLAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX DEPT., INVESTIGATION CELL-II, DABAGARDENS, 2. SRI P KRISHNA RAO, S/O P. VENKATA SUBBAYYA R/O D.NO. 45- 49-10, ABID NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 3. SRI C SUBRAHMANYAM, CHARTED ACCOUNTANT R/O DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PASALA PONNA RAO (SC FOR CENT GOVT.) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No:33 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has not received any instructions from the parties- appellants. 2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date:27.01.2026 KNN 4 86 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.33 of 2009 (Dismissed for default) Date: 27.01.2026 KNN