1 2026:HHC:34376 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.713 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Rajni Kumari and others ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate has placed on record communication dated nil, wherein it has been stated that the claims of the petitioners have been considered and budget has been allocated for disbursement in their favour. The bill is being prepared by the BEEO Jhandutta and will be submitted to the Treasury Officer, Jhandutta for passing very shortly. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:34376 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, if the petitioners are sill still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 14, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)