Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19667 (BOM)

KALPESH RAMESH SANTE v. NIKITA KALPESH SANTE AND ANR

WP/5066/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

908.WP-5066.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5066 OF 2026 Kalpesh Ramesh Sante … Petitioner V/s. Nikita Kalpesh Sante & Anr. …. Respondents ______________________ Mr. Dadhichi Mhaispurkar a/w Mr. Atharva S. Jagtap and Mr. Rohan Patil, for the Petitioner. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.2-State. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 6 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. Mr. Mhaispurkar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that inadvertently, Writ Petition is titled as Criminal Writ Petition. He states that in fact, the impugned order is passed under Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. 2. Accordingly, the Petitioner is granted leave to carry out appropriate amendment. 3. Amendment to be carry out forthwith and re-verification is dispensed with. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.08 11:54:00 +0530