Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19663 (KAR)

MR. MISBHA UDDIN NASER v. J C FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

WP/16594/2026 · 2026-06-08

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 16594 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR. MISBHA UDDIN NASER S/O LATE HABIB UDDIN AHMED AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.124, SFS 208, OPP MOTHER DAIRY, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU-560064. 2. MRS. MAMATHA GOVINDARAJU, D/O. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, REGISTERED OFFICE: GOVIANU NO.385, 13TH CROSS, BASHYAM CIRCLE, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560080. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRADEEP KUMAR P.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. J.C.FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTER UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2002 REGISTERED OFFICE AT 203-206, 2ND FLOOR, WING A, INSPIRE BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI - 400051. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026 ALSO AT 43 RESIDENCY ROAD, SHANTALA NAGAR - ASHOK NAGAR, BENGALURU-560025. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 2. AUTHORISED OFFICER OF J.C FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2002 REGISTERED OFFICE AT 203-206, 2ND FLOOR, WING A, INSPIRE BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI - 400051. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 3. RBL BANK BRANCH OFFICE 16TH FLOOR, EMPIRE TOWER, RELIABLE TECH PARK, OFF. THANE-BELAPUR ROAD, AIROLI, NAVI, MUMBAI-400708. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Sri.Pradeep Kumar P.K., counsel for the petitioners appeared in person. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioners submits that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5