Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1966 (BOM)

SANJAY BALOO BHUSE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

CP/94/2026 · 2026-08-21

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

910-CP-67-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 67 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12408 OF 2025 Appa Balbhim Thorat ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12556 OF 2025 Nitin Vishnu Hembade ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12557 OF 2025 Sanjay Baloo Bhuse ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12297 OF 2025 Snehal Shankar Gavali ...Petitioner. Versus The State Of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. Gaikwad RD 1 of 3 910-CP-67-2026.doc WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 96 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12292 OF 2025 Akash Pandurang Salunkhe ...Petitioner. Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Prashant S. Bhavake for the Petitioner. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP, for the Respondents-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : August 21, 2026. P. C. : 1. By the present group of Contempt Petitions, contempt was alleged of the orders passed by this Court directing the Respondents to issue the shalarth ID and include the names of the Petitioners in the shalarth pranali, which would enable to release the salary of the Petitioner. 2. Without going into issue as to whether the timeline was adhered to, as the Shalarth IDs have now been granted on 6th July 2026 and 7th August 2026, it would be appropriate if the contempt petitions are disposed of. The contention sought to be raised by the learned AGP is that the Management has not submitted the salary bills, whereas the contention of Mr. Bhavake is that it was for the Deputy Director to Gaikwad RD 2 of 3 910-CP-67-2026.doc include the names of the Petitioners in the shalarth pranali, which is not even done. It is expected that necessary steps will be taken within a period of four weeks from today by the Management as well as the Deputy Director of Education, so that the grants can the released to the Petitioners. 3. The Contempt Petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. 4. In event of non-compliance, liberty to revive the cause. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 3 of 3 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.08.21 19:46:11 +0530