MD SARFARAZ ANSARI @ SARFARZ @ CHOTTU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6405/2026 · 2026-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19652 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19652 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20380] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6405 of 2026
------
1. Md. Sarfaraz Ansari @ Sarfarz @ Chottu aged about 20 years, Son of Md. Karim Ansari,
2. Nobab Mal @ Nawab Mal, aged about 19 years, son of Khokan Mal; Both Resident of Jogiya Patti Modidih No.-7, P.O. & P.S.- Jogta, District- Dhanbad.
.... .... …. Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party.
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate.
For the State
: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 09-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jogta P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4), 305(a) of the B.N.S. 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners are that the petitioners have committed theft of 100 metre cable, worth Rs. One lakh from the godown of informant by committing lurking house breaking by opening a small passage on the wall of the godown. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false and they are not named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused persons namely Chottu Khan @ Billa and Saheb Ansari. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertakes that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted the petitioners have no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-16 and they have been in custody since 31.05.2026 as mentioned in para-15 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Dhanbad in connection with Jogta P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026 the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/07/2026 Amar/