Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19651 (RAJ)

ANMOL MEGHWAL S/O SHRI BABULAL MEGHWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14838/2025 · 2026-01-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3264] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14838/2025 Anmol Meghwal S/o Shri Babulal Meghwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Opposite Sheetala Mata Temple, Dhakad Khedi, P.s. Udhyog Nagar, Kota City. (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.336/2025 registered at Police Station Udhyognagar (Kota City), District-Kota City for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though there is an allegation of having caused injuries to the injured, Dhanraj but none of the injuries sustained are dangerous to life. It is further submitted that while four cases are registered against the present petitioner but he has been acquitted in two of [2026:RJ-JP:3264] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14838/2025] them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 27.07.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that, considering the gravity of the injury, the petitioner is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Anmol Meghwal S/o Shri Babulal Meghwal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/7