Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19916
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 4298 of 2026 Suchitra Kumari, aged about 46 years, Daughter of Bandhuram Yadav, Resident of Barwa Toili, Lohardaga, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga, District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. Secretary, Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. Director, Secondary Education, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S. -Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
6. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at ChaibaganGali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... … Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Robin Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Akanksha Basundhra Raje, Advocate
Mr. Shashwat Kumar Jha, Advocate
Ms. Nishi Rani, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate
--------
Order No. 2/Dated: 7th July 2026
The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs:
“1 a) For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) specifically a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents appoint the petitioner on the of post of Trained Graduate Teacher pursuant to Advertisement No. 21/2016, for which the selection process has already been concluded by the respondent no.5,
2026:JHHC:19916
2
conducting Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination, and merit list has been published and the petitioner is placed on a higher merit position, compared to the appointees in the process, than those who have been appointed pursuant to the
judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court passed in the case of Soni Kumari 422 employees; b) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order (s). direction(s), specifically a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher, on the basis of the principle as has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Satyajeet Kumar and Others Vs. State of Jharkhand and others, Civil Appeal No. 4038 of 2022 and analogous cases, judgment and
order dated 02.08.2022, wherein it has been held at paragraph nos. 27 and 28, "the fresh selection be based on revised merit and based on already Published cut-off by the last obtained selected candidate in each Trained Graduate Teacher subject against respective categories": c) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s), specifically a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to appoint the petitioner and release all consequential benefits in pursuance to appointments so made.
AND/OR For issuance of such other writ, order or direction as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper for doing conscionable justice to the Petitioner.”
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment passed in W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Others Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others along with Analogous Cases) the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondent-JSSC.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC does not raise objection.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid, the instant writ application stands
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for.
5. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of.
6. Pending I.A., if any, also stand disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 7th July 2026 Amit Uploaded on 10/7/2026