1 / 2026:CGHC:12041 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2413 of 2026 Ku. Rupa Chhatrawani D/o Late Shri Sitaram Chhatrawani Aged About 46 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Mohra, Block Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Bilaspur Cum Chairmen District Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur Cum Secretary District Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Masturi Cum Secretary Block Level Yuktiyukt Karan Committee Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents- State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 13/03/2026 1. The Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus quashing the impugned posting order dated 04.06.2025 to the petitioner (ANENXURE P. 1.) 2 / 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents allowing the petitioner to work at Govt. Primary School, Hardidih, Block Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.) 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court pleased to pass similar order as per order, dated 02.02.2026 passed in WP(S) No.1226/2026 and other bunch of writ petitions. (ANENXURE P-6.) 10.4 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as petitioner had not submitted any representation/appeal before the Committee constituted under the Rationalization Policy, and therefore, he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking permission to submit representation before the concerned authority and direction be issued to the concerned authority to take decision on the representation to be submitted at the earliest. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State would submit that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to submit representation before the concerned authority, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit representation before the concerned authority and 3 / if such a representation is submitted by the petitioner, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of representation. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Saurabh