1 2026:CGHC:22346 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 253 of 2019 1 - Alok Jhunjhunwala S/o Shubhas Jhunjhunwala Aged About 38 Years R/o In Front Of Agroha Bhawan, Korba District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Anasuya Jhunjhunwala W/o Subhash Chandra Jhunjhunwala Aged About 61 Years R/o In Front Of Agroha Bhawan, Korba District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Prity Jhunjhunwala W/o Alok Jhunjhunwala Aged About 33 Years R/o In Front Of Agroha Bhawan, Korba District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Suresh Kumar Sahu Presently Posted As Tahsildar, District - Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Karuna Ahir Presently Posted As Naib - Tahsildar, Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - B.S. Markam,( The Then S.D.O. (R) Korba) Presently Posted As Under Secretary, Revenue Board, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.05.18 16:06:27 +0530 2 4 - Ajay Prakash Singh, R/o - C.B.S.B. Colony, Post Office Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Saksham Soni, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Amit Kumar Chaki, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 12/05/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this Contempt Petition alleging willful disobedience on the part of respondent No. 1. The respondent No.1 has willfully disobeyed the interim order of stay granted vide order dated 27.02.2019 passed in WPC No 760 of 2019. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No 1 would submit that action of demolition of wall by respondent No 1 is due to misunderstanding of order which is subject matter of the contempt petition. He contended that respondent is tendering unqualified apology and would submit that respondent No 1 is ready to construct the demolished wall by his own cost. He also submits that after coming to his knowledge that some inadvertent mistake has been committed by him, respondent No.1 has issued notice to petitioner and also affixed notice on his residence asking him to take back the articles seized by 3 respondent No. 1. He submits that respondent No.1 is also ready to pay compensation with regard to articles which became unusable due to efflux of time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is instructed to submit that if respondent No. 1 construct the demolished wall and pay suitable amount for perished goods, he will not press this contempt petition. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, 5. Considering the pleadings made in the para-10 of additional reply dated 28.08.2019, this petition is disposed of on an undertaking of respondent No.1 of constructing demolished wall at his own cost within a period of 4 weeks from today and to pay compensation of perished goods within the said period. 6. With the aforementioned observation and direction, notice is discharged, and the contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi