SINTU KUMAR ALIAS SINTU KUMAR TANTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6389/2026 · 2026-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19645 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19645 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:20385 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6389 of 2026
------
1. Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Kumar Tanti, aged about 23 years, R/o Kurmidih, P.O. & P.S.-Balidih, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand.
2. Prince Kumar, aged about 24 years, S/o Munna Upadhyay, R/o Kurmidih, Hanuman Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Balidih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanjay kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 09-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.91 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S.,
2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed theft of Aluminium wire, 70kg of which was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent has been mentioned in para-06 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 23.05.2026 as is evident from para-12 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.91 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/07/2026 Abhiraj/