Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19645 (AP)

M.KASAIAH v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/586/2019 · 2026-03-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010162002019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2026 IN / AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 586/2019 Between: 1. M.KASAIAH, EMPLOYEE, RIO D.NO.25-22-92, 1/1 LANE, KONDA VENKATAPPAIAH COLONY, LALUPURAM ROAD, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2. VINNAKOTA ARGUNA, D/O.VINNAKOTA SIVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.25-22-91, 1ST LANE, KONDA VENKATAPPAIAH COLONY, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. PARUCHURI INDUMATHI The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, impugning the judgment dated 29.05.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.516 of 2016 on the file of the Court of I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, 2 confirming the judgment dated 07.09.2016 passed in C.C.No.568 of 2015 by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Guntur for the offences under Sections 354-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2026 are filed by the Respondent No.2 / De facto complainant seeking permission to record the compromise between her and the Petitioner and to acquit the Petitioner by allowing the present Criminal Revision Case. 3. Petitioner / Accused and Respondent No.2 / De facto complainant appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. Respondent No.2 / De facto complainant by way of an affidavit would submit that at the intervention of elders and well-wishers of both parties, the matter was amicably settled between her and the Accused and that she has no objection to record the compromise and to acquit the Accused by allowing the Criminal Revision Case. 6. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2026 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the concurrent judgments dated 29.05.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.516 of 2016 on the file of the Court of I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, and in C.C.No.568 of 2015 the judgment dated 07.09.2016 passed by 3 the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Guntur for the offences under Sections 354-A and 506. Accused is acquitted from the present case. Petitioner / Accused shall pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to spend the said amount to meet the necessities of the children in the Government Home. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.03.2026 Note: Issue C.C today B/o. Dinesh 4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2026 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:586 OF 2019 Dt.05.03.2026 Dinesh