( 2026:JHHC:20448 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3254 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3254 of 2026 Anshu Rawani, age about 22 years, son of Ashok Rawani, resident of Village- Babudiha, P.O. & P.S. Karmatar, District- Jamtara … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. ----- 03/10.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.20 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of I.T. Act and Section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the allegations of fleeing away from the spot is false. He then submits that only mobile has been recovered from the place of occurrence and in paras 53 and 81 of the case diary, it has come that the said mobile was not in the name of this petitioner and that is in the name of another accused. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 14 of this application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is said to be accomplice of apprehended co- ( 2026:JHHC:20448 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3254 of 2026 accused and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 14 of this application and only allegation is there against the petitioner that he has fled away from the place of occurrence and in paras 53 and 81 of the case diary, it has come that the mobile, which has been recovered from the place of occurrence, is not in the name of the petitioner and that is in the name of another accused person. and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.20 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 10th July, 2026 Ajay/