Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19634 (RAJ)

RAMLAL S/O NANDRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14796/2025 · 2026-01-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:762] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14795/2025 Dharma Alias Dharmendra S/o Kalyan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bhadota, Police Station Kolaras, District Shivpuri (M.p.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14796/2025 Ramlal S/o Nandram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Badhera, Post Lukwasa Police Station Kolaras, District Shivpuri, (M.p.) (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal Mr. Bhim SIngh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.86/2025 registered at Police Station Kasba Thana, District Baran for offence under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. [2026:RJ-JP:762] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14795/2025] 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that allegations levelled against the present petitioners i.e. Dharma and Ramlal for committing the theft of motorcycle of the complainant. Though six cases have been reported as criminal antecedents against Dharma but he has been acquitted in three of them. As far as Ramlal is concerned only one case was reported as criminal antecedent. They again submit that petitioners are behind the bar since 10.10.2025 and 05.10.2025 respectively. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 8. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Dharma Alias Dharmendra S/o Kalyan Singh and Ramlal S/o Nandram, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall [2026:RJ-JP:762] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14795/2025] appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/59-60