CRM-M-20943-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.208 CRM-M-20943-2026 Decided on : 21.05.2026 Kanwalpreet Singh @ Billa ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM :
   

 *** Present : Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Amrit Kaur, AAG, Punjab for the respondent-State. ***  

  , J (ORAL)
                        !" 
#
#$    
%&'

$&'

&
' &$'$
&'
#
&'
#&  

   (   
$%'    )(*  +,             - .(- ,      ,  (       / 0   , ( 1    !"  2                  (      1     3  (     -   2         0       1  . MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20943-2026 2   (           3               4  +  5 +,It is further contended that there is nothing on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel contends that the case is based upon documentary evidence and, therefore, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall fully cooperate with the investigation. On these grounds, it is prayed that the present petition be allowed. 4 On the other hand, learned State counsel while referring to the status report already filed, has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail by submitting that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature. She contends that the petitioner was an active member of unlawful assembly formed by the co-accused having an intention to assault the complainant. She further contends that the petitioner armed with kirpan inflicted repeated blows upon the complainant and injury Nos.1 and 6 have been specifically attributed to the petitioner. Learned State counsel contends that as per the MLR, the injuries attributed to the petitioner are on the vital part of the body of complainant. Thus, the petitioner does not deserve any concession from this Court. $ Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and after perusing the record  3    3          1- an active member of unlawful assembly formed by the co-accused having an intention to assault the complainant. He alongwith co-accused armed with kirpan inflicted repeated MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20943-2026 3 blows upon the complainant. As per the MLR, the injuries attributed to the petitioner  3  (      - 3   6 5    -             7    3      (   3      (  .     8    -       ( - 0   (   3     (     5   3               3 3    ( % !   (  -          57  -   3         &'65 , - (    /  /    3      -  (  7    ! -         0 (    1 9    (  5  
    -        :
                                                          !  "#$               %                                               !            %                                  &           MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20943-2026 4             '                                     (                            '                         %                
; )  5   (          (  <    +3             3 3         - 3(  -      6        3 (     (   !  (    3(  <       ( = 3       

 ((   Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No >   :?= MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh