RAJENDRA GUPTA S/O LATE SHRI SITARAM GUPTA v. SITARAM GUPTA S/O LATE SHRIRAMCHANDRA GUPTA
CFA/1838/2025 · 2026-02-09
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19629 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19629 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5962] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1838/2025
1. Rajendra Gupta S/o Late Shri Sitaram Gupta, aged about 57 Years,
2. Smt. Manju Gupta W/o Shri Rajendra Gupta, Both R/o House No.565, Scheme No.2, Lajpat Nagar, District Alwar. ----Appellants Versus Sitaram Gupta S/o Late Shriramchandra Gupta, aged about 82 Years, R/o House No.565, Scheme No.2, Lajpat Nagar, District Alwar. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gopal Singh Bareth Mr. Rajendra Gupta (petitioner is present in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal Mr. Sitaram Gupta (respondent present in person) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 09/02/2026
1. Appellant- Mr. Rajendra Gupta and respondent- Mr. Sitaram Gupta, who are son and father, and are present in person before this Court and are duly identified by their respective counsel.
2. Matter has come upon application (IA No.1/2026) for taking on record the compromise dated 27.01.2026 and to decide the present appeal in terms of the said compromise.
3. The appellant-Mr. Rajendra Gupta, is present in person before this court and undertakes to comply with the terms and conditions of the compromise dated 27.01.2026, and assures this court that he will not commit breach of any of the terms and conditions encapsulated in the compromise dated 27.01.2026.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent upon instructions of his client, who is present in person, submits that the respondent has no objection in allowing the application (IA No.1/2026) and setting aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 04.10.2025 in
[2026:RJ-JP:5962] (2 of 2) [CFA-1838/2025] Civil Suit No.9/2023 (CIS No.41/2023) passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No.1, Alwar. He further submits that he has no objection if the compromise dated 27.01.2026 is also taken on record. He further submits that the respondent has entered into the said compromise only on the assurance given by the appellant- Mr. Rajendra Gupta, and prays that in case the appellant fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the compromise dated 27.01.2026, the respondent may be at liberty to move an application for revival the same.
5. For the reasons mentioned in the application (IA No.1/2026) and the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent, the same is allowed. The compromise dated 27.01.2026 is taken on record.
6. In view of the consonance between the parties to the appeal, the impugned judgment and decree dated 04.10.2025 passed by learned Court below is set aside in terms of the compromise dated
27.01.2026.
7. However, it is made clear that in case the appellant fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the compromise dated 27.01.2026, the respondent shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application for recalling or revival of the present first appeal.
8. Accordingly, the present civil first appeal stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid compromise.
9. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-109