$~O-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010115032026 + CS(COMM) 311/2026, I.A. 7933/2026 & I.A. 7934/2026 MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola and Mr. Shivang Sharma, Advs. versus SAVYA REALTY LLP & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 24.09.2026 I.A. 25382/2026 (joint application for settlement between the parties) CS(COMM) 311/2026, I.A. 7933/2026 & I.A. 7934/2026 1. During the pendency of the suit, the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, under the following terms: “i)The Defendants acknowledge and admit the Plaintiffs rights in the "EDITION"/ trademarks. ii) The Defendants undertake that they have already discontinued the use of the impugned mark "THE EDITION" for their real estate project, as project name and/or email addresses or otherwise. iii) The Defendants undertake not to use, now or in the future, or seek registration of any mark identical and/or confusingly similar to the Plaintiffs registered trademark EDITION, that may constitute infringement or pass mg off of the Plaintiffs EDITION / trademarks. iv) The Defendants have removed any and all promotional, marketing, and advertising material relating to the impugned mark "THE EDITION" from This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:21:59 all physical and digital platforms under its control, including but not limited to its official website, social media handles, third-party sites, signages at project site, business cards etc. The Defendants further undertake not to disseminate or cause to be disseminated in any form whatsoever, any promotional content bearing the impugned mark. v) The Defendants shall take reasonable steps to ensure take-down of any/all display, publication, circulation, advertisement, listing, or reference to the Impugned Mark appearing on any of their websites and also third-party websites. The Defendants shall not be held liable or responsible for any use, display, publication, circulation, advertisement, listing, or reference to the Impugned Mark appearing on any third-party websites, where such content is generated or uploaded independently by such third parties as the same is not under the control of the Defendants. vi) The Defendants hereby undertake that they shall not, either by themselves or through their affiliates, licensees, distributors, dealers, agents, or assigns, commit or cause to be committed any act that constitutes infringement or passing off of the Plaintiffs "EDITION"/ trademarks or any mark deceptively similar thereto, in any manner whatsoever. vii) The parties agree that the signatories to the present settlement are fully competent and authorized to enter into the present settlement. viii) The Parties agree that all the terms and conditions laid out in this application are fair and reasonable and have been entered into after full appreciation of its various clauses and implications. ix) The Parties hereby agree before this Hon'ble Court that the present terms and compromise shall be binding on all their principal officers, directors, agents, servants, successors, and assigns in business interest and title and all other acting for and on its behalf, for all times to come. x) The Parties agree that all their disputes have been resolved by virtue of this Application and the parties, unless either of them is in breach of this settlement, would not institute or press whatsoever further remedies available to them.” 2. Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:21:59 3. The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition. 4. The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the civil suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement. 6. The Registry is directed to draw-up a decree sheet. 7. The civil suit along with the pending applications stands disposed of. 8. 50% of the Court fee shall be refunded to the plaintiff on due verification. 9. The next date fixed i.e. 28.09.2026 stands cancelled. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2026/P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:21:59