925.WP-1376.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1376 OF 2026 The Tata Power Company Limited … Petitioner V/s. Shravan Ajay Pawar & Anr. …. Respondents ______________________ Mr. Pranav Badheka, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Chirag Naik, Mr. Ashish Mishra and Mr. Aman Tiwari i/by MZM Legal LLP, for the Petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Ugle i/by Mr. Vikas Somawanshi and Mr. Pratik Mishra and Mr. Mohan Waghmode, for Respondent No.1. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.2-State. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 14 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 states that there is an alternate remedy of revision available to challenge the impuned order. 2. In view of the said contention, Mr. Badheka, learned senior cousnel appearing for the Petitioner, on intructions, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with leave as aforesaid. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.15 11:11:12 +0530 925.WP-1376.26.DOC 4. However, it is clarified that as the impugned order is dated 1st January 2024 and the Writ Petition has been filed on 4th March 2024, the Petitioner will get benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from 4th March 2024 till today. 5. It is further clarified that the contentions on merits are expressly kept open. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of subject to above. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 PPN