VIKKY RAM ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5926/2026 · 2026-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19626 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19626 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20368] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5926 of 2026
------ Vikky Ram @ Vikash Kumar, aged about 30 years, Son of Jugal Ram, resident of Village Latu, P.O. Phulso, P.S. Bariyatu, District Latehar (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Srivasta, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-09-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No.7 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted tractor of the informant at the gunpoint after tying the hands and legs of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-08 of the instant bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.03.2026 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024 passed in B.A. No.10488 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the
trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No.7 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 09.07.2026 Saroj/