Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19624 (RAJ)

SHYOKARAN S/O SH. DOLA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14158/2025 · 2026-01-16

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2027] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14158/2025 Shyokaran S/o Sh. Dola, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Jato Ki Dhani, Kucheel, District Ajmer ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S. Sandhu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. Sambhu Singh Shekhawat, Police Inspector, Civil Lines, Ajmer. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 390/2024 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer for offences punishable u/S 467, 468, 474, 120B & 506 IPC. 2. Heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been implanted as an accused only being the witness of the alleged will said to have been forged. He also submits that under the directions of this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and had joined the investigation and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery. [2026:RJ-JP:2027] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14158/2025] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor verifies the fact of appearance of the accused petitioner before the Investigating Officer. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and taking into consideration the allegations against him and the fact that he is only a witness of the alleged will and has already joined the investigation, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer in FIR No. 390/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /297