Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19619 (JHR)

NANDU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/4962/2022 · 2026-07-08

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20417 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4962 of 2022 --------- 1. NANDU YADAV, Aged about 49 Yrs, Son of Rekhlal Mahto, R/o Dholpahari, P.O. & P.S. Sonaraithari, Dist Deoghar 2. SUNIL KUMAR SHUKLA, Aged about 36 Yrs., Son of Sri Satyendra Shukla, R/o Anapurna Colony, P.O. & P.S. Pakur, Dist. Pakur.. 3. MUKESH KUMAR RAM @ MUKESH RAM, Aged about 38 Years, Son of Raju Ram, R/o Barganda, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, Dist. Giridih. 4. DINESHWAR KUMAR VERMA, Aged about 35 Yrs, Son of Dilip Prasad Verma, R/o Gram Merkhoghundi Kla, P.O Balgo, P.S. Jamua, Dist Giridih. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Director, M/s Raider Security Services Pvt. Ltd., 103, Bariatu Road, Bargain Village, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, Dist. Ranchi-834009 ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, A.C. to G.P.-I Mrs. Oishi Das, A.C. to A.G. --------- 07/Dated:-08.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to prefer a fresh writ application. 2. There is no objection from the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JULY 8, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 10/07/2026