1 / 3 2026:CGHC:20821 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3846 of 2026 Savitri Sahu W/o. Late Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu Aged About 43 Years Pesa- Rasoiya/sfaikarmi/dainik Majdoor, Shaskiya Pri. Matric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas Choriya Niwasi- Gram Choriya Jila- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Scheduled Tribe And Scheduled Caste Vikas Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Aayukta Scheduled Tribe And Scheduled Caste Vikas Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Sahayak Aayukta Aadivasi Vikas Janjgir-Champa District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Collector District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Adhikshak Shaskiya Pri. Matric Scheduled Caste Kanya Chatrawas Choriya, Vikas Khand Bamhanidih, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Dahariya, Advocate For State : Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.05.08 11:01:38 +0530 2 / 3 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 05/05/2026 1. Petitioner through the present writ petition seeks for a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the claim of the petitioners for placing their services as contingency paid employees. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petitioner is working with the respondent since 2010. The petitioner meanwhile had moved an application before the respondents for considering her claim for placing her as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the petitioner rendered with the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already made detailed representation before the authorities concerned which is pending consideration and till date has not been decided by the respondents authorities. Therefore, direction may be issued to respondent no. 3 to take appropriate decision on the claim of petitioner for being placed as contingency paid employee. 4. Learned counsel for State submits that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to respondent no. 3 to consider the representation made by the petitioner and to take decision in accordance with the rules governing the field. 6. It is expected that respondent no. 3 shall take a decision on the claim of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today. 3 / 3 7. Petitioner will be at liberty to submit fresh comprehensive representation before respondent no. 3 if she so desires and if such a representation is submitted, respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the fresh representation along with pending representation. 8. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza