Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19613 (KAR)

CHIKKAPPA HOSMANI S/O GUDDAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106338/2024 · 2026-06-04

K S Hemalekha

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26506-DB WP No. 106338 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 106338 OF 2024 (KLR-LG-PIL) BETWEEN: 1. CHIKKAPPA HOSMANI S/O GUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS OCC. SHEPHERD/AGRICULTURE 2. MAHABALESH DESAI S/O. BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 3. KOTEPPA HOSMANI S/O. GUDDAPРА AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 4. HANMANTAPPA DESAI S/O. EERAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 5. MALATESHA ANAVATTI S/O. PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26506-DB WP No. 106338 of 2024 6. MAHESHA HAVALI S/O. PAKKEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 7. NINGAPPA KOPPARASINAKOPРА S/O. PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 8. BASAPPA HOSAMANI S/O. GUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD 9. MANJU HARIJANA S/O. PAKKEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE/SHEPHERD ALL THE PETITIONERS HEREIN ARE THE RESIDENTS OF KAMANAHALLI VILLAGE HANGAL TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 197 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SUMANTH KUMAR S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING VIDHANA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI - 560 001 BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26506-DB WP No. 106338 of 2024 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HAVERI REVENUE DISTRICT HAVERI - 581 110 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAVANUR REVENUE SUB-DIVISION SAVANUR - 581 118 4. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LAND HANGAL TALUK BY ITS SECRETARY THE TAHASILDAR HANGAL - 581 104 5. THE TAHASILDAR HANGAL TALUK HANGAL - 581 104 6. SURESH NINGAPPA KAGADANAVAR S/O. NINGAPPA KAGADANAVAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O. KAMANAHALLI HANGAL TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 197 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1 TO 5 & MS. DEEPIKA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI PRAKASH M. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED RESOLUTION PASSED IN THE MEETING DTD. 6/9/1994, BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 VIDE ANNEXURE-G & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26506-DB WP No. 106338 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition as a Public Interest Litigation [PIL], inter alia, praying that the resolution dated 06.09.1994 and the Saguvali Chit issued in the order bearing No.NCR.VAHI.145.2014-15, dated 13.08.2014 be set aside. 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the concerned Tahsildar has already filed an appeal against the mutation entries effected in favour of respondent No.6 impugning the Saguvali Chit dated 13.08.2014, on the ground that no application under Form 50 or Form 53 was found in the Application Grant Register and the proceedings dated 06.09.1994, on the basis of which, the name of respondent No.6 was entered in land records, are not in order. 3. In view of the above, we do not consider it necessary to entertain the present petition as a PIL. The same is disposed of. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26506-DB WP No. 106338 of 2024 4. The petitioners are at liberty to furnish their submission to the concerned Tahsildar and if the concerned Tahsildar finds merit in the same, they may raise appropriate grounds in the appeal proceedings. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23