- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26911 MFA No. 3869 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3869 OF 2021(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O LATE PRAKASH 2. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, S/O LATE PRAKASH 3. LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS D/O LATE PRAKASH 4. PADMA AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS S/O LATE PRAKASH SL.NOS.2-4 SINCE MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER PARVATHAMMA AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT BASAVESHWARA EXTN MALEBENNUR, HARIHARA DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. B CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26911 MFA No. 3869 of 2021 S/O BHEEMAPPA (DRIVER OF AUTORICKSHAW BEARING REGN NO.KA-17/A-7399) JIGALI VILLAGE, HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001 2. D N PARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O NEELAPPA (OWNER OF AUTO RICKSHAW BEARING REGN NO.KA-17/A-7399) JIGALI VILLAGE, HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., I FLOOR, VALI COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK N PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR 3, NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.09.2010 PASSED IN MVC NO. 22/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, HARIHAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation for the appellants even on the second call. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26911 MFA No. 3869 of 2021 2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to do the needful, learned counsel for the appellants has failed to do so. Though the matter is of the year 2019, it seems that neither the appellants nor the counsel for the appellants are interested in prosecuting this appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26