2026:JHHC:20015-DB - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 571 of 2026 ---- Shree Balaji Agrawal Infra (JV), a joint venture, having its registered office at C-2/101, Aishwarya Chamber, G.E. Road, Teliabandha, Raipur (C.G), P.O. and P.S. Teliabandha, District:- Raipur, through its authorized Signatory shree Niwas Pandey, aged about 52 years, sonof Uma Kant Pandey, resident of Near Shiv Mandir (Honda Workshop), Panki Road, Baralota, P.O. & P.S.-Baralota, District:-Daltonganj, Palamu: Jharkhand. … … Petitioner/Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Alka Tiwari, wife of not known, the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3.Sri Sunil Kumar, son of Not Known, the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4.Sri Sanjay Kujur, son of not know, The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5.Sri Pradeep Kumar, son of not known, The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Garhwa, having its office at Kutchary Road, P.O. and P.S.-Garhwa, District – Garhwa. 6.Manohar Kumar, son of not known, (Presently In-Charge), Superintendent Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Garhwa, having its office at Kutchary Road, P.O. and P.S. – Garhwa, District-Garhwa. …Respondents/Opposite Parties ------- CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC I Mrs. Neeharika Mazumdar, AC to AG -------- Order No. 04 : Dated 7th July, 2026 1. Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instruction from, Ms. Amrita Sinha, learned counsel on record, on instruction, has submitted that order dated 16.07.2024 read with order dated 27.08.2024 passed in W.P. (T) No. 3257 of 2024 has been complied with, which is the subject matter of the present contempt case, by passing reasoned order. It 2026:JHHC:20015-DB - 2 - has been submitted that since the decision has been taken against the petitioner and as such, while not pressing the instant contempt case, liberty has been sought for to challenge the said order. 2. There is no opposition on behalf of Opposite Parties. 3. In view of submission advanced by learned counsel for the parties, with the liberty aforesaid, the instant contempt case stands dismissed as not pressed and as such disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) 7th July, 2026 Alankar/