APHC010155402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8040/2026 Between: 1. MANGINA NAGA VISHNUVU, S/O V.K.RAMA RAO, AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ALAMUR PACS., ALAMURU, R/O ALAMURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI, AT BHIMAVARAM. 3. THE ALAMURU PACS LTD, , NO.WG.1767 ALAMURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP.BY OFFICIAL PERSON-IN-CHARGE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the resolution No. 16 dated 19-09- 2025 of the 3rd respondent, even after lapse of six months, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to implement the resolution No. 16 dated 19-09-2025 of the 3rd respondent and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking the following main prayer: “……..declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the resolution No.16 dated 19-09- 2025 of the 3rd respondent, even after lapse of six months, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to implement the resolution No.16 dated 19-09- 2025 of the 3rd respondent and to pass…….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gopi Sai Manoj Krishna, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture & Cooperation. Perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while reiterating the contents of the writ affidavit, submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as clerk in the 3rd respondent Society in the year 2016 by recording the date of birth (DOB) as 15.09.1963 and subsequently, the petitioner was promoted as Chief Executive Officer of the 3rd respondent Society. He submits that due to some discrepancy that crept in, the petitioner's date of birth was wrongly mentioned as ‘15.09.1963’ instead of ‘16.09.1966’ and to that effect, the petitioner made representation dated 12.07.2024 before the 3rd respondent Society for necessary correction, but the same was not acted upon. 3 4. Learned counsel submits that, in fact, the very same petitioner filed W.P.No.19715 of 2025 for non-consideration of representation dated 12.07.2024 by the respondent authorities and the said writ petition was disposed of, with a direction to the 2nd respondent Society therein/ 3rd respondent Society herein, to consider the representation dated 12.07.2024 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with Law. He submits that pursuant to the said orders passed by this Court, the 3rd respondent Society passed resolution No.16 dated 19.09.2025 (Ex.P.2), by unanimously resolving to continue the petitioner in the 3rd respondent Society as CEO till 30.09.2028, however, in spite of the same, no action has been taken by the 2nd respondent. 5. Learned counsel by stating immense urgency in the lis, submits that due to the said inaction of the respondent authorities, the petitioner is about to retire on 31.03.2026, and if that happens, he would suffer serious prejudice and irreparable loss. 6. Conversely, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has already filed W.P.No.25447 of 2023 before this Court and the same is pending. However, he expressed his reservation about the authenticity of resolution No.16 dated 19.09.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent Society. 7. Considering the above submissions made by both the counsel, and taking note of the resolution No.16 dated 19.09.2025 said to be passed by the 3rd respondent Society, this Court without going into the merits of the case and 4 in order to put quietus to the lis, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following terms:- i. The petitioner is forthwith directed to make written representation by duly enclosing resolution No.16 dated 19.09.2025, passed by the 3rd respondent Society and other relevant documents. ii. In that event, the 2nd respondent, after perceiving the said representation and getting confirmation from the 3rd respondent Society with regard to the authenticity of the resolution No.16 dated 19.09.2025, shall pass appropriate orders, in accordance with Law, on or before 30.03.2026. iii. The learned Government Pleader for Agriculture & Cooperation is directed to communicate the orders of this Court to respondent Nos.1 to 3 so as to implement the same without any retraction. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. _______________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.03.2026 GVK 5 41 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.8040 of 2026 Date: 24.03.2026 GVK