BEVARA VENKATA PADMAJA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/8121/2025 · 2026-02-17
B Krishna Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19605 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19605 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010153292025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8121/2025 Between:
1. BEVARA VENKATA PADMAJA, W/O DILIP KUMAR, AGED 44 YRS, RESIDING AT
PLOT NO.354, ISR FLOOR, HMT SATAVAHANANAGAR, BACKSIDE OF HMT SATAVAHANANAGAR SCHOOL, KPHB KUKATPALLI, TIRUMALAGIRI, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500072. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, . VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or a direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in interfering with the rightful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over
2
her house plot measuring 86.76 Square yards in Sy.No. 15/12 of Mudasarlova Village of Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District by not allowing her to make construction over her plot as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority and against the provisions of Article 300-A of Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the Respondent not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over her said plot, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over her house plot measuring 86.76 Square yards in Sy.No. 15/12 of Mudasarlova Village of Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District including its construction pending disposal of the above writ petition,and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 01.04.2025 passed in WP.No.8121 of 2025 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, for which, he has taken a Court slip dated
17.02.2026. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. No costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
18.02.2026. PNS