IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13395 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Raj Kumar Yadav @ Raj kumar S/o Ramaji Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 2. Ranjeet Yadav S/o Mandev Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 3. Krishna Yadav S/o Kunj Bihari Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 4. Sujit Yadav @ Sanjit Yadav S/o Late Mandev Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 5. Amarjeet Yadav S/o Umesh Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 6. Arun Yadav S/o Umesh Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 7. Biresh Yadav S/o Rajkumar Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 8. Bika Yadav @ Bira Yadav S/o Rajbansi Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 9. Ramjanam Yadav S/o Lakhan Yadav R/o Village - Madhu Sareya, P.S - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj 10. Vishal Yadav S/o Majister Yadav R/o - Devapur, P.S - Barauli, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 24-06-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier, the petitioner no.8. namely Bika Yadav @ Bira Yadav was arrested and his anticipatory bail application was withdrawn Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13395 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 2/4 on 29.04.2026. 2. However, during the pendency of the petition one more accused i.e. petitioner no.7 namely Biresh Yadav stands arrested and as such, prayer for withdrawal of his anticipatory bail has been made. 3. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no.7, Biresh Yadav stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Heard Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Aadesh Raj, learned counsel representing the informant as also Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP representing the State. 5. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 295 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on 20.08.2025 by the informant Balister Yadav. 6. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was at his door, the petitioners took away his son Arun Yadav and when the Dasrath Yadav and Vinay Kumar rush to his rescue by the named accused person, resorted to assault, in the process, number of persons from the informant side got injured, shifted to Sadar Hospital, Gopalganj which followed the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13395 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 3/4 F.I.R. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered injuries and in a zeal of implicating each and everyone, from 55 years old Ramjanam Yadav to 18 years old Vishal Yadav have been named in their F.I.R. 8. In this case, earlier the case diary and injury reports were called for which are on record and which shows that beside the informant Vinay Kumar, Bullet Yadav and Dasrath Yadav were injured and injuries in most of the cases have been found to be grievous in nature. 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they are in the process of submitting proper application to show that atleast some of the accused were not at the place of occurrence which can be ascertained from their mobile/CDR. These are the facts which can be taken up for consideration when the petitioner move for bail. 10. As of now, taking into account the facts on record as also the injuries that the informant side has suffered, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. 11. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13395 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 4/4 12. However, if the petitioners surrender within a period of four weeks, file bail application, the court concerned shall consider the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T