[2026:JHHC:20338] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5543 of 2026 ------ Yuvraj Yadav @ Yuvraj Singh, Aged about 22 years, S/O- Late Devendra Parasad Singh @ Debilal Yadav, R/O- Kurmipara, Mihijam, P.O. + P.S.- Mihijam, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand- 815354 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubhashis Rasik Soren, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-09-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.145 of 2025 arising out of Mihijam P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27, 25 (1b), 26/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of Rahul Kumar Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. as one of the persons who was chasing the deceased, as informed by the deceased to his wife over phone, immediately preceding the occurrence. It is further submitted that in the meanwhile the wife of the deceased who claims to have talked the deceased immediately before the occurrence and the deceased allegedly disclosed the name of the petitioner to his wife namely Shreyas Singh, has been examined with her maiden name ‘Shreya Dutta’ as P.W.8 and she has not taken the name of the petitioner to be the person who was chasing her husband. It is also submitted that so far as ten witnesses have been examined and none of them have stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 09.07.2025 passed in B.A. No.5573 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.08.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamtara in connection with S.T. Case No.145 of 2025 arising out of Mihijam P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.07.2026-Animesh/