Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1959 (KAR)

SRI BUDEEN KHAN v. SMT BUDEEN BEE

CRP/672/2024 · 2026-02-24

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11376 CRP No. 672 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 672 OF 2024 (IO-) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BUDEEN KHAN SON OF LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT BILLINAKOTE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 111. 2. SRI. JAMMER KHAN, SON OF LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT BILLINAKOTE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 111. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. VASUNADARA T.P, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. BUDEEN BEE DAUGHTER OF LATE KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT BILLINAKOTE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 111. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11376 CRP No. 672 of 2024 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVANA, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.08.2023 PASSED ON I.A.X IN OS.NO.145/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.X FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) TO (d) R/W SEC.151OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 17.02.2026, this Court had passed the following order: "Finally, a week's time is granted for complying with office objections. If office objections are not complied with, re-list this matter on 24.02.2026 for dismissal." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11376 CRP No. 672 of 2024 2. In spite of the said order, petitioners have not complied with the office objections. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2