APHC010154662021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 891/2021 Between: 1.P.SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC. BILL COLLECTOR, VINUKONDA MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.A.KISHORE KUMAR,, S/O. HANUMANTHA RAO, AGE 51 YEARS, OCC. BORE OPERATOR, VINUKONDA MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.B SRREENIV, COMMISSIONER, VINUKONDA MUNICIPALITY , GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.SRI M MALLIKARJUNA NAYAK I A S, COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION PADMINI ENCLAVE, MAHATMA GANDHI INNER RING ROAD, ANNAPURANA NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.SMT Y SRI LAKSHMI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.SRI M SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE, COMMISSIONER, VINUKONDA MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION PADMINI ENCLAVE, MAHATMA GNADHI INNER RING ROAD, ANNAPURANA NAGAR GUNTUR DISTRICT 6.SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL 2 C.C. No.891 of 2021 KSR,J ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. RR 4 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 12.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN CC NO-891 OF 2021 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.G RAJU 2.Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3.C SUMON 4.SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI 3 C.C. No.891 of 2021 KSR,J The Court made the following ORDER :- Pursuant to the directions of this Court, dated 26.12.2025, the 4th respondent appeared before this Court in person and respondent Nos.5 and 6 appeared through virtual mode. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 submits that the orders of this Court have already been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioners also confirms the factum of compliance of the orders of this Court. 3. In view of the above submissions, though there is some delay in compliance, no further orders are required to be passed. 4. Accordingly, the present Contempt Case is closed as the orders have already been complied. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____ K.SURESH REDDY, J Dt. 23.01.2026 SAB 4 C.C. No.891 of 2021 KSR,J 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.891 OF 2021 Dt. 23.01.2026 SAB