Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19586 (JHR)

RAJENDRA TIWARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/297/2025 · 2026-07-08

Sujit Narayan Prasad

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20301 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 297 of 2025 --------------- Rajendra Tiwary, aged about 59 years, son of Shri Sharda Pati Tiwary, resident of Village-Paro, P.O & P.S-Bano, District-Simdega ........Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Simdega, P.O & PS-Simdega, District- Simdega. ...... Opposite Parties/Contemnors CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Adamya Kerketta, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Advocate For the OP-State : Mr. K.K. Singh, SC-V Order No.05/Dated: 8th July, 2026 1. Mr. Adamya Kerketta, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, at the outset has submitted that in terms of the order passed by this Court vide order dated 21.02.2024 passed in W.P(S) No.6594 of 2013, which is the subject matter of the present contempt case, a reasoned order has been passed by the concerned OP No.2 vide Memo No.1866 dated 30.09.2024 which is appended to the show cause dated 29.08.2025 as Annexure-A. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.09.2024 by preferring a writ petition and, as such, he does not want to press the present contempt petition with liberty to pursue the said writ petition. 3. Such submission has been made in presence of the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite parties. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Dated:08.07.2026 Sudhir