APHC010156872019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 571/2019 Between: 1. YANAMAREDDY SIVAJOGI REDDY @ SIVAREDDY, SIO (LATE) CHITTAYYAREDDY, AGED 48 YRS, D.NO.8-6-46, PEDAWALTAIR , VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. YENAMAREDDY KUMARI, W/O SIVAJOGI REDDY AGED 46 YRS , D.NO.8-6-46 PEDAWALTAIR , VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI. 2. KONA VENKATA RAMA KUMAR RAMA KUMAR, S/O (LATE) K.V. RAMANA , AGED 42 YRS, D.NO.4-44-17/3 KAGITHALAVARI STREET , PEDAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused against the judgment dated 04.04.2019 passed by the learned II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in Crl.A.No.274 of 2014 confirming the judgment dated 03.12.2014 passed in C.C.No.131 of 2014 by the learned Special Magistrate- 2 IV, Visakhapatnam for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. Sri R.Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. None appeared for Respondent No.2. 4. This Court, upon consideration of the submissions and the material on record, finds that the learned trial Judge, on proper appreciation of evidence, held that both the Accused borrowed a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- from the Complainant and executed Ex.P.1 promissory note and issued Ex.P.2 cheque towards legally enforceable debt. The learned Appellate Judge, on re- appreciation of the evidence, concurred with the said findings. In the absence of any perversity or illegality in the concurrent findings, this Court finds no ground to interfere in revisional jurisdiction. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.02.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.R.C.No.571 of 2019 Dt.06.02.2026 Dinesh