Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19582 (CAL)

KOUSHIK BARMAN v. UNION OF INDIA

CRM (A)/895/2026 · 2026-05-06

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.05.2026 Sl. No.147 Ct. 28 NB C.R.M. (A) 895 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. And In the matter of: Koushik Barman … petitioner Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Mr. Sagar Saha. …for the UOI. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner although the NCB is represented. No accommodation is sought. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. on 05.05.2026, no one represented the petitioner or prayed for any adjournment when the matter was called on for hearing. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for. (Jay Sengupta, J.)