Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19581 (AP)

Gurugubelli Madhusudhana Rao v. B. Koteswara Rao

CC/559/2018 · 2026-03-06

R Raghunandan Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010155272018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 559/2018 Between: 1. GURUGUBELLI MADHUSUDHANA RAO,, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO PILLALAVALASA VILLAGE, PONDUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. GURUGUBELLI SREERAM MURTHY, OCC CULTIVATION R/O PILLALAVALASA VILLAGE, PONDUR MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. GURUGUBELLI DALI NAIDU., OCC CULTIVATION RIO PILLALAVALASA VILLAGE, PONDUR MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. B KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER. SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM 2. S V SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PONDURU MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, PONDURU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. B KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT, 0/O MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PONDUR MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, PONDUR VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. G RAJEEV, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PILLALAVALASA GRAM PANCHAYAT, 2 PILLALAVALASA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of Order Di. 09.02.2016 passed in W.P No. 3922 of 2016 on the file of this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present contempt case has been filed on the ground of violation of order, dated 09.02.2016 in W.P.No.3922 of 2016. The main writ petition itself had been settled in Lok Adalat on 07.11.2020. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives in this contempt case and accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 07.03.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 559/2018 Date: 07.03.2026 KA