Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19579 (CHH)

KRITESH KUMAR KUMHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/29/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21567-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 29 of 2026 1 - Kritesh Kumar Kumhar S/o Brijbhan Kumhar Aged About 36 Years R/o -Bineka Road -170, Biladi Tilda- Nevra District- Raipur C.G. 2 - Mukesh Kumar Chakradhari S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Chakradhari Aged About 32 Years R/o Shankar War No. -02 Baghdai Road Sahsoki Tilda Nevra District Raipur C.G. 3 - Janak Lal Chakradhari S/o Ramdhar Chakradhari Aged About 38 Years R/o Bhimrao Ambedkar Ward No.-27, Pragati Nagar Mova Raipur District Raipur C.G. 4 - Kunji Lal Chakardhari S/o Khemlal Chakardhari Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. -18, Khaprikala Kesda Raipur District Raipur C.G. 5 - Mulchand Chakradhari S/o Dhanu Lal Chakradhari Aged About 31 Years R/o Ward No. -18, Khaprikala Kesda, Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary, Under Secretary Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collectorate Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - Sub Divisional Office Rev-Raipur Distirct Raipur C.G. 4 - Mineral Inspector/assistant Mineral Officer Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.05.11 10:58:58 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Add. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 08.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, learned counsel for petitioners as well as Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed I.A. No. 03/2026 i.e. application for exemption from depositing of security deposit. 3. The said application i.e. I.A. No.03/2025- Application for exemption from payment of security deposit stands rejected. 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdrawn the present petition with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security amount. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security deposit as per High Court Rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet