Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19578 (AP)

AKULA VENKATA SWAMI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8154/2025 · 2026-03-30

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010157602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8154/2025 Between: AKULA VENKATA SWAMI, S/O. MUDAVA VENKATAIAH, AGED 40 YRS, CULTIVATION, CHINTALAPALLI VILLAGE, KALASAPDU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALASAPADU P.S, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. AKULA RAMANAIAH, S/O. NADIPI VENKATAIAH. 5. AKULA SRINIVASULU, S/O NADIPI VENKATAIAH OCC (SAR CPL - SPECIAL ARMED RESERVE CENTRAL POLICE LINE) 6. AKULA RAMANAIAH, S/O.NADIPI VENKATAIAH. (RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 6 ARE R/O. CHINTALAPALLI VILLAGE, KALASAPADU MANDAL KADAPA DISTRICT.) ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: SATYA SREENIVASA RAO K Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous, as the charge sheet has been filed, including Respondent No. 6 as one of the accused. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 31.03.2026 RSI 3 157 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8154 of 2025 Date: 31.03.2026 RSI