IN T 219 Sh. Chande Dr. J. Gane CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court i others”, wh directed to upgradation of receipt o 7.5% intere petitioner, i Punjab 199 respondents proceedings Court has s COCP-1781-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1781 of Date of decision : hander Parkash Lineman (Retd.) Versus . Ganesan, IAS and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Jai Singh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate Ms. Anisha Rana, Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 4-HV I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 07.8.2025 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CWP-380-2014 titled as “Chan s”, whereby the writ petition was allow ed to “…release the consequential ation to the petitioner, within a period ipt of a certified copy of this order. A nterest per annum commencing from er, in terms of A.J. Randhawa Supg. 1998(1) SCT 343”. At the very outset, learned couns ndents submits that during the penden edings, substantial compliance of the d has since been effected and Cheque 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 781 of 2026 (O & M) sion :-11.05.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate ocate with HVPNL. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of “Chander Parkash vs. HVPNL and allowed and the respondents were tial benefits of third financial riod of three months from the date r. Any further delay would entail om the date of retirement of the pg. Engineer (Retd.) vs. State of counsel appearing on behalf of the endency of the present contempt the directions issued by the Writ heque No.447462 dated 08.5.2026 VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.13 12.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document amounting t credited in acknowledg on 08.5.202 thereof has record. submits that further surv same may a record. complied w question, n contempt p compliance Contempt o May 11, 202 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-1781-2026 (O & M) nting to Rs.4,57,938/-, drawn on State Ba ed in the account of the petitioner. wledgment regarding receipt of the afore .5.2026 is also available on the photo f has been handed over in Court toda Learned counsel for the petitio its that in view of the compliance reporte r survives for adjudication in the prese may accordingly be disposed of. I have heard learned counsel fo Since the directions issued by th lied with and the petitioner has admitt on, no useful purpose would be serv mpt proceedings pending. This Court liance of the order dated 07.8.2025 has b Accordingly, finding no ground t of Courts Act, the present contempt Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 tate Bank of India, has already been oner. It is further submitted that e aforesaid amount by the petitioner photocopy of the cheque. A copy rt today and the same is taken on petitioner, upon instructions, fairly eported by the respondents, nothing present contempt petition and the sel for the parties and perused the by the Writ Court have now been admittedly received the amount in e served by keeping the present Court is satisfied that substantial has been made. round to proceed further under the tempt petition is disposed of. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.13 12.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document