Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19577 (BOM)

SMT. SINDHUTAI RAJARAM LINGADE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE MINISTRY OF REVENUE AND MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS

WP/9397/2023 · 2026-10-14

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9397 OF 2023 Smt. Sindhutai Rajaram Lingade .... Petitioners & Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Mr. Sachin K. Hande, Advocate for Petitioners. AGP, P.N. Diwan, for Respondent – State. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 14th October 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that certain errors in the prayer clauses, as well as other substantial errors, have been noticed in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition. 2. Liberty, as prayed for, is granted. 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, subject to limitation and other applicable legal requirements. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 1/1 3 WP 9397.2023.doc Dusane BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2026.10.15 17:33:01 +0530