Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19575 (CHH)

RAKESH SHRIVASTAVA v. ICICI BANK

WPC/6126/2025 · 2026-05-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22397 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6126 of 2025 Rakesh Shrivastava S/o Harishankar Shrivastava Aged About 50 Years R/o H-14, Nootan Colony, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus ICICI Bank Through Branch Manager Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (C.G.) - 495001 ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent : Mr. Aman Saxena, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 12.05.2026 1. Today, when the case was called for hearing, despite repeated calls, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not appear and no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. There was also no request for adjournment nor any explanation offered for such non- appearance. In the aforesaid circumstances, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.12 18:36:22 +0530 2 2. Mr. Aman Saxena, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent, is present. 3. In view of the continued non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner and the apparent lack of interest in pursuing the writ petition, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- /- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh