Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19573 (JHR)

TAUHIR ANSARI @ TOUHID ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6352/2026 · 2026-07-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:20244) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6352 of 2026 Tauhir Ansari @ Touhid Ansari, aged about 34 years, son of late Kurban Ansari, resident of village – Rehalgada, PO & PS – Jariyagarh (Govindpur), District – Khunti. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. [Thr:- VC] ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 09th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 133 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 317(5), 338, 336(3), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of stolen vehicle being a member of organized gang of criminal. It is next submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the Garage. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate – 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 133 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 09.07.2026 Aditi