2026:HHC:34709 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8787 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.08.2026 _____________________________________________________________________________ M/s Des Raj & Veena Rani ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, Advocate. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and petitioner has accepted the proposal of the respondents-State and, therefore, he has instructions to withdraw this petition. 2. Accepting his prayer, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), 17th August, 2026 (Susheel) Judge. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?