Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19568 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR DAS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4275/2026 · 2026-07-07

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20430 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4275 of 2026 1. Sanjay Kumar Das, aged about 46 years son of Arun Chandra Das, Resident of Gobindpur, Near Shiv Mandir, vill-Ganw Bhilej Road, P.O.- Govindpur, P.S.- Govindpur, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. 2. Sweta Sharma, aged about 31 years, Wife of Mithlesh Singh Choudhary, Resident of Govindpur, Vill Bastipur P.O.-Bagsuma, P.S.- Govindpur, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. 2. Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District -Ranchi. 3. Director, Directorate of Secondary Education, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 4. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District- Ranchi. 5. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at ChaibaganGali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Kumar Dubey, Advocate Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate -------- Order No. 2/Dated: 7th July 2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment passed in W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Others Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others along with Analogous Cases) the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty 2026:JHHC:20430 2 to the petitioners to approach the respondent-JSSC. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC does not raise objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid, the instant writ application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. 4. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. 5. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 7th July 2026 Amit Uploaded on 10/7/2026