Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19568 (BOM)

NEHA MANOHAR GIMBHAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

WP/11948/2026 · 2026-10-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

sr.50-wp-11948-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11948 OF 2026 Neha Manohar Gimbhal .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Adv. Sanskruti Yagnik for the Petitioner. Adv. Nikhil Chavan for Respondent No.2-State CET. Ms. Savina R. Crasto, AGP for State. CORAM: R.I. CHAGLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2026 P. C. 1. Ms. Sanskruit Yagnik, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, has sought to dispose of the Petition in view of the prayers in the Writ Petition having been worked out by the Petitioner having been granted admission in B.Sc. Horticulture at Respondent No.3 College under the Other State Quota (OS Quota). The Petitioner has also paid registration fees as well as the admission fees to the Respondent No.3 College. 2. It is pertinent to note that, by an ad-interim Order dated 7th September 2026, this Court had directed Respondent No.2 State CET Cell OCTOBER 15, 2026 Mansi shelke MANSI DHANANJAY SHELKE Digitally signed by MANSI DHANANJAY SHELKE Date: 2026.10.15 18:53:08 +0530 sr.50-wp-11948-2026.doc and Respondent No.3 College to reserve a seat in B.Sc. Horticulture at Respondent No.3 College for the Petitioner under the OS Quota. Therefore, on the Petitioner having been admitted in Respondent No.3 College, in the said B.Sc. Horticulture course, under the OS Quota, and the requisite registration as well as admission fees have been paid by the Petitioner, the Writ Petition has worked itself out. 3. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [R. I. CHAGLA, J.] OCTOBER 15, 2026 Mansi shelke