Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19568 (AP)

Pattenagaramy Danaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6783/2018 · 2026-03-29

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010152712018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6783/2018 Between: 1. PATTENAGARAMY DANAIAH,, S/O. YELLAPPA, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDDAVARAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. TAVISIKONDA VENKATAMMA,, W/O. KAMBAIAH, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDDAVARAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLAMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. MUNAGA PEDDALA BALA RANGADU,, S/O. RANGANNA, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDDAVARAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLAMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 JS,J W.P.No.6783 of 2018 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BETHAMCHERLAMANDAL, BETHAMCHERLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. M RADHAMMA, W/O. M.THIRUPATHALAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. MUDDAVARAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLAMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not making the lands in Sy.No. 528/B into house plots as per the original layout in pursuance of the pattas granted in favour of the petitioners by proceedings Rc.H.871.94 dated 06-03-1994 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to make the house plots in pursuance of the original layout and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the land in Sy.No. 528/B situated at Muddavaram village, Bethamcherla mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.6783 of 2018 ORDER: At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the official respondents submits that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the order dated 06.12.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31974 of 2015. The operative portion of the order reads as under: “In view of the same, instead of going into the merits of the case, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners, without following due process of law, until the pattas granted in favour of the petitioners are subsisting.” On perusal of the record, I find that this case is covered by the aforesaid order. Having regard to the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the said order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 30th March, 2026 cbs 4 JS,J W.P.No.6783 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.6783 of 2018 30th March, 2026 cbs