Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19566 (DEL)

JOGINDER PAL NARANG & ANR. v. AMAN DEEP SINGH GANDHI

RC.REV./208/2024 · 2026-09-23

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010472192024 + RC.REV. 208/2024, CM APPL. 44404/2024 (Stay) & CM APPL. 1605/2025 (Dir.) & CM APPL. 5093/2025 (Addl.Doc.) JOGINDER PAL NARANG & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Piyush Pahuja and Mr. Droan Dutt Sharma, Advocates along with son of Petitioner No. 1 in person. versus AMAN DEEP SINGH GANDHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sumit Ahuja, Advocate along with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 23.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, assailing the Order dated 07.02.2024 passed by the learned JSCC-ASCJ-GJ, South-East District, Saket Courts, Delhi (the then learned ARC-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) in case bearing No. E-84/20 (New No. 263/2020) titled as “Aman Deep Singh Gandhi v. Joginder Pal Narang & Anr.”, whereby the Application for leave to defend preferred by the Petitioners was dismissed and an Eviction Order was passed in favour of the Respondent. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties, on instructions, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:42:58 submit that the parties have arrived at an understanding, in terms whereof the Petitioners shall continue to occupy the subject premises for a period of nine (09) months from today. Petitioner No.1 is represented by his son, who is present in Court, while the Respondent is present in person. Both are identified by their respective counsel. 3. It is further agreed between the parties that the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month, which is presently being paid by the Petitioners to the Respondent, shall continue to be paid until the Petitioners vacate the subject premises. 4. The Petitioners are directed to file an Affidavit of Undertaking incorporating the aforesaid terms within a period of two (02) weeks from today. It is agreed that, in the event the said Affidavit of Undertaking is not filed within the stipulated period, the Petitioners shall vacate the subject premises forthwith. 5. The Petitioners undertake to abide by the terms and conditions recorded herein and incorporated in the Affidavit of Undertaking to be filed by them. In the event of any breach of the aforesaid Undertaking, the Respondent shall be at liberty to avail of such remedies as may be available to him in accordance with law, including initiation of contempt proceedings. 6. In view of the aforesaid undertaking furnished by the Petitioners and the terms mutually agreed between the parties and duly recorded hereinabove, no further orders are warranted in the present Petition. 7. The present Petition, along with the pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 23, 2026/tk/ma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/09/2026 at 11:42:58