Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19562 (PNJ)

SUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS. v. SHYAMAL MISRA AND ORS.

COCP/1002/2026 · 2026-05-11

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 102 Sukhdev Si Shyamal Ltd., Panch CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court Haryana Po petition was learned cou representati will be consi will be passe such claim petitioners, COCP-1002-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1002 of Date of decision : dev Singh and others Versus mal Misra, Chairman, Haryana Pow Panchkula and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate Ms. Kriti Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Puneet Jindal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advocate; and Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G for the respondents. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 28.7.2025 (Annexure P-6) passe ourt in CWP-8661-2016 titled as “Su na Power Generation Corporation Ltd on was disposed of as not pressed on th d counsel for the respondents to the ntation/claim is received at the hands considered and appropriate order on passed within a period of eight weeks f aim and in case, after the decision any ers, the same will be extended, oth 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 002 of 2026 (O & M) sion :-11.05.2026 …..Petitioners Power Generation Corporation …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA vocate with ocate assisted by te; and l. A.G., Haryana has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of s “Sukhdev Singh and others vs. n Ltd. and others”, whereby the on the basis of statement made by to the effect that “…in case any ands of the petitioners, the same on the said representation/claim eks from the date of receipt of any any relief is to be extended to the otherwise due reasons will be VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.13 12.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document mentioned i the petition information compliance 27.4.2026; t produced b Copy thereo tag/paginate Court order passing a S authority, n may be disp learned cou disposed of May 11, 202 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-1002-2026 (O & M) ed in the speaking order to be passed itioners, which reasons will be convey tion and necessary action…..”. Learned counsel for the respon liance has been made while passing 026; thus, no cause survives in the prese Copy of the aforesaid Speak ced by the learned counsel for the res thereof is supplied to learned counsel fo ginate the same at appropriate place in th Learned counsel for the petitione order dated 28.7.2025 (Annexure P-6) h g a Speaking Order dated 27.4.2026 by rity, nothing survives in the present con e disposed of. In view of the above noted facts d counsel for the petitioners, the p sed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 sed for not accepting the claim of nveyed to the petitioners for their respondents submit that necessary assing a Speaking Order dated present petition. Speaking order dated 27.4.2026 he respondents is taken on record. nsel for the petitioners. Registry to ce in the paper-book. titioners submits that since the Writ 6) has been complied with while 026 by respondent No.3/competent nt contempt petition and the same facts and the submissions made by the present contempt petition is any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.13 12.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document