MEHMOOD SOHEL @ SOHEL S/O MUNNA KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/565/2026 · 2026-02-23
Ravi Chirania
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1956 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1956 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8313] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 565/2026 Mehmood Sohel @ Sohel S/o Munna Khan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Harijan Mohalla Aliganj Chhabra Police Thana Chhabra District Baran Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan assisted by Ms. Taziya G. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 23/02/2026
1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner Mehmood Sohel @ Sohel S/o Munna Khan, aged about 22 years, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.349/2025 dated 01.10.2025 registered at Police Station Chhabra District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 119(1), 3(5) of B.N.S.
2. Learned counsel submits that the first bail application was withdrawn by the petitioner vide order dated 17.12.2025 at that stage, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S.
3.
Learned counsel submits that the Police after completing the investigation filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made. Learned counsel further submits that the injured person
[2026:RJ-JP:8313] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-565/2026] suffered only one grievous injury i.e. on one hand and the other co-accused Raja S/o Allaudin & Abdul Arshad @ Ashu S/o Abdul Hamid have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2025. Learned counsel further submits that as far as pendency of the cases are concerned, the petitioner has already been acquitted by the Trial Court in the case under Section 302 IPC and rest of the cases are simple in nature. In view thereof,
learned counsel prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application.
5. This Court after considering the fact that the other co- accused Raja & Abdul Arshad @ Ashu have already been enlarged on bail, charge-sheet has already been filed, no recovery is required, trial will take sufficient long time, nature of allegations, petitioner is behind the bar since long and he has already been acquitted for offence under Section 302 IPC by the Trial Court, after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner Mehmood Sohel @ Sohel S/o Munna Khan on bail.
6. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Mehmood Sohel @ Sohel S/o Munna Khan shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is
[2026:RJ-JP:8313] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-565/2026] further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.
7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor is free to file application for cancellation of the bail application.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/3