2026:JHHC:536 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 615 of 2024 Manmath Kumar Pati aged about 69 years, son of Banshidhar Pati, resident of Teli Tola, Near PHED, Post and Police Station Seraikella, District Seraikella-Kharsawan ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. Sri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, son of .......not known to petitioner, presently posted as Principal Secretary, Department of Drinking water and Sanitation Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Dhurwa, Post and Police Station Dhurva, District Ranchi, 3. Sri Nagesh Mishra, son of ......not known to petitioner, presently posted as Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional secretary, Department of Drinking water and Sanitation, Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Dhurwa, Post and Police Station Dhurwa, District Ranchi; 4. Sri Hari Kumar Keshri son of ...not known to petitioner, presently posted as Divisional Commissioner, Kolhan Division, Chaibasa, Post and Police Station Chaibasa, District Chaibasa; 5. Sri Ravi Shankar Shukla, son of .... not known to petitioner, presently posted as Deputy Commissioner, Seraikella-Kharsawan, Post and Police Station Seraikella, District Seraikella-Kharsawan; 6. Sri Radheshyam son of .....not known to petitioner, presently posted as Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Circle, Chaibasa, Post and Police Station Chaibasa, District Chaibasa; 7. Sri Ranjit Kumar Thakur son of ......not known to petitioner, presently posted as Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Division, Seraikella-Kharsawan, Post and Police Station Seraikella, District Seraikella-Kharsawan ... … Opposite party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V -------- Order No. 05/Dated: 09th January 2026 Defect pointed out by the Registry is hereby ignored. 2. The instant contempt case has been filed by the petitioner for willfully violating the order dated 25.04.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6872 2026:JHHC:536 2 of 2019. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this contempt case. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is dismissed as withdrawn. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 9th January 2026 Amit Uploaded on 13/1//2026