CWP-11455-202 IN TH 117 Charan Kaur Union of India & CORAM: HON Present: - Ms. Mr. Adv Mr. *** JAGMOHAN B 1. The the Constitution alternative passa Rajpura, District Divisional Magis 2. The land was acquire given to cultivate this Court appro SDM who held Manager/Enginee again approache department has 2026 -1- N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat Versus ndia & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Ms. Maloo Chahal, Advocate, for th Mr. Sushant Kareer, Mr. Sukhleen a Advocates, for respondents No.1, 2 & Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. *** AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petit itution of India is seeking directio passage to her land situated at Vil istrict Patiala in view of order date Magistrate, Rajpura (‘SDM’). The petitioner is 83 years old senio cquired in May’ 2013 by the Railway ultivate her land. She pursuant to orde approached Deputy Commissioner, P held a meeting on 26.10.2023 a ngineer-3, DFCCIL, Ambala to prov roached SDM who vide order date t has refused to provide the passa NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-11455-2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents AGMOHAN BANSAL , for the petitioner. leen and Mr. Jaskaran Singh, , 2 & 4-UOI. jab. t petition under Articles 226/227 of irection to respondents to provide at Village Shambhu Khurd, Tehsil r dated 26.10.2023 passed by Sub- d senior citizen. She claims that her ilways Department. No passage was to order dated 06.12.2016 passed by oner, Patiala. Matter was marked to 023 and directed Deputy Project o provide passage to her land. She r dated 22.12.2023 noted that the passage but asked the Railways 7 of ovide ehsil - t her was d by ed to oject . She t the ways VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.13 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-11455-202 Department to pr authorities prope respondents askin 3. Lear petitioner is alrea elevated, the pet work, she is pray 4. The fact. Evidence n cannot adjudicate 5. Dis permissible by la 13.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh 2026 -2- t to provide her suitable passage as pe propelled her to serve Legal Notice d ts asking them to comply with order da Learned counsel for respondents N is already having passage. Her land is he petitioner is supposed to get done is praying for private passage. The issue raised by the petitioner is ence needs to be recorded. This Court udicate disputed question of fact. isposed of with liberty to the p law. Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye e as per Rules. Inaction on the part of otice dated 05.02.2024 upon official rder dated 26.10.2023. ents No.1, 2 & 4-UOI submits that land is abutting the road. As road is t done earth work. To avoid earth er is a purely disputed question of Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction the petitioner to avail remedy as (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No art of ficial that ad is earth on of ction as AL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.13 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.